Skip to main content

AR-15s: An Education

Science. The human brain is not fully developed until the age of twenty-five. Fully developed adults process the world relying heavily on the prefrontal cortex, the part of the brain responsible for good judgement and understanding long-term decisions. Kids under the age of twenty-five  rely heavily on the amygdala, the part of the brain responsible for processing emotion. The amygdala develops first. This is why my seven and eleven-year-old sons have more emotional outbursts than I do. They just feel hurt and angry in a maelstrom of childhood emotion. Logic has not kicked in yet. It won’t fully until they are twenty-five.

Still, a nineteen-year-old boy, who I wish the media would stop calling a man, legally bought an AR-15 semi-automatic assault rifle. 

My amygdala says, that thing would be awesome to square up some grudges I feel against the legislators who have wronged me and this country by weaponizing our citizenry, and profiting off of the carnage. My prefrontal cortex, however, says you can’t shoot people because you are angry. But, that part of the brain is not fully developed in many of the people buying these weapons. 

No semi-automatic guns until you have a fully developed brain. Couldn’t we at least start there?

Marketing. The AR-15 is, according to the NRA’s website, “America’s Most Popular Rifle.” The NRA has an entire page dedicated to singing its praises in which they explain the perks of a gun that is “customizable, adaptable, reliable, and accurate." It goes on to explain that “The AR-15s ability to be modified to your own personal taste is one of the things that makes it so unique,” like it’s a fucking American Girl Doll. They brag it “can be skinned and wrapped in all different types of colors and patterns,” like it's an iPhone case. 

It is a gun. The NRA wants it to look like a toy. 

Kids like toys. “Make it even cooler,” reads one Instagram post the NRA’s article highlights “add a suppressor from SilencerCo.” Who are they marketing these semi-automatic, military-grade weapons to?

Oh, right. Nineteen-year-old boys with a troubled past. And the country they want to fear those boys enough to buy their own. 

Profit margins are a bitch. 

English. The NRA loves to argue semantics. They love to explain that these weapons are not automatic weapons, as a way of arguing they are safe and reasonable. “There is a vast difference,” they write, “between fully automatic and semi-automatic firearms.” This means you must pull the trigger each time you want to fire a bullet; you can’t just squeeze and hold. 

Vast is an adjective. It means “of very great size or proportions; huge; enormous.” As an English teacher, I must question their use of that word. Right now, hold your hand up like you are holding a gun. For one minute, pull your finger like you are pulling a trigger as quickly as possible. Count how many times you can do that in just one minute. One-hundred? Two-hundred? One or two hundred bullets per minute is not enormously different from automatic fire. A front-loading muzzleloader that must be reloaded after each shot would be vastly different. A semi-automatic with a thirty bullet magazine? That is not a vast difference. 

That is total bullshit. 

History. The Second Amendment was not written with AR-15s in mind. Saying that these weapons should be protected by that document is absurd. The Second Amendment was written when the only guns in existence needed to be loaded one bullet at at time. 

On March 13, 1996 a man walked into a classroom in Dunblane, Scotland and killed sixteen kids and a teacher. Seventeen people, just like Florida. In response, the government introduced the Firearms Act of 1997 banning all cartridge ammunition handguns with the exception of .22 caliber single-shot weapons. Shortly thereafter those guns were banned as well. This left only muzzle-loading guns, the very guns our forefathers were actually talking about. 

There have been no mass shootings since. 

We are always talking about learning from history. There is the lesson. They did not offer thoughts and prayers. They offered sweeping reform to protect their children. 

I was teaching the year Columbine happened. It was my first year. That event stopped this country in its tracks. The shooting in Florida, because of the failure of our legislators, was business as usual. 

Math. According to a Washington Post analysis, more than 150,000 students attending 170 different schools have experienced a shooting on campus since Columbine in 1999, my first year as a teacher.

Since 1968 when they began collecting these numbers, there have been more than 1,500,000 gun deaths in this country. 

Guns + more guns = more gun deaths.

Gym. Keep running those laps kids, because the leaders of this country are relying on you to be able to outrun the bullets. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

An Open Letter to My Seventh-Grade Flag Football Team

Boys, I have coached most of you for years now, and I want you to know that I have never been more proud than when you lost 16-60 this past weekend.  You heard that right.  When the opposing coach, up by more than forty points, told his team to play “without restraint” you continued to play with it. That is more important than any win.  Quick vocab lesson since I am an English teacher: Restraint is a noun. It means self-control. Staying under control is one of the most important lessons games like flag football can teach you. Not exercising control is what leads to penalties in games and all sorts of bad things in the real world.  While the other team continued to launch passes to the endzone, and comments across the line of scrimmage, you maintained control. The one moment it boiled over, you immediately apologized. You showed restraint, and that is why I am proud.  You are going to face stuff like that your whole lives. You are going to come across people who think winning is more im

A Farewell to My Seniors

It has been years since I first assigned commencement speeches to my seniors to end their high school experience. The stories they have told year after year always reaffirm why I keep doing this job. It has become a tradition for me to deliver a speech of my own to end the year. Here is this year's edition. I n his book Fablehaven Brandon Mull writes, “Smart people learn from their mistakes. But the real sharp ones learn from the mistakes of others.” That’s one thing I hoped to accomplish with these speeches to conclude the year. I hope Maddi’s statement that being cat-called makes women feel unsafe prevents all the young men sitting here from making that mistake. I hope Ryan’s mistake of not getting involved right away in high school inspires you to jump right into things in college. I hope the cautionary tales people have shared about addictions and eating disorders prevent you all from making the mistake of ignoring warning signs and encourage you to ask for help when you need

The Rules, as They Apply to Serena

“ Well, she DID break the rules ,” some people are saying. This past Saturday, Serena Williams was penalized in ways that were unprecedented for a Grand Slam final. Some want to spin the narrative that technically Serena deserved what she got. That is an oversimplification that needs more careful thought. Her first warning for coaching was justified, technically , by the fact that her coach was indeed gesturing for her to go to the net. Set aside for now the fact that men are rarely, if ever, called for similar behavior. Her second infraction, resulting in a point deduction, was for smashing her racket. She did. The Grand Slam rulebook defines “verbal abuse” as any statement about an official that “implies dishonesty or is derogatory, insulting or otherwise abusive.” So for her third infraction -- calling Ramos a “liar” and a “thief” -- she technically broke that rule resulting in a game deduction late in the second set. What people need to acknowledge is how sexism and racis