“I wanted you to see what real courage is, instead of getting the idea that courage is a man with a gun in his hand.”
That is what Atticus Finch says to his children in To Kill a Mockingbird. His words have always pretty much summed up my beliefs about guns: one can live a life of courage without ever touching a gun. His brand of courage - fighting with words and ideals - could do all that was necessary in the face of malevolence. I was certain of it.
Still, when an angry mob comes to lynch Tom Robinson, Harper Lee places another character up in a nearby window. He leans out watching the scene unfold, his double-barreled shotgun trained on the angry mob - just in case Atticus’ brand of courage is not enough of a deterrent. Little kids and their lawyer father appealing to human decency might stop some crimes, she seems to hint, but there are others that need something more lethal. Despite Atticus’ crusade for justice, it is a gun that slaughters Tom Robinson. Courage can only take you so far when you come up against armed antagonists, even in literature.
I have always wanted to fight with my mind the way Atticus does, the way he teaches his children to. I try to do that in my classroom, fighting any potential bigotry or injustice in the minds of my students with close reading and reflective writing. I have always been certain that ideas and ideals would triumph.
But now I worry that someday I may lose that fight to a student bent on destruction. Someday, a student lost in his own tempest of anger and aggression may arrive armed and looking to mow us all down. As long as our country keeps offering them ready access to guns, I don’t want to be armed with my ideals. I want to be armed with a gun.
That statement puts me a very, very long way from the beliefs and ideals I once had, but this is the country in which I teach. This is America.
I have never fired a gun, or held one in my hands. In college I interned briefly at a school in the Bronx where I became certain that walking through metal detectors past armed police officers was bad for education. I was a first year teacher when Columbine happened, and I was certain it was an anomaly. I was an English teacher, and I believed firmly that guns did not belong in schools.
After a few more shootings, I endorsed the idea of armed police officers in schools. Now the bullets just keep coming. Now school shootings are a trend. Now I realize what happened that day nearly twenty years ago during my first year as a teacher was not an anomaly. Now, I am ready for a gun of my own.
We must make schools the “hard targets” of which people speak. I am certain my life and the lives of my students would be safer if I were trained and armed. So, I would go through police training if that were offered to me. Given the opportunity, I would carry a gun to school each day. I don’t think I can successfully do my job anymore without a gun, because above all, my job is to help my students grow. I can’t do that if I must sit unarmed while my students are slaughtered.
That belief saddens me. That belief keeps me up at night. Still, I am certain of it.
The other day, my high school practiced our security drill for an active shooter.
After an administrator announced that we were doing a lockdown drill, my thirty-two seniors stood up quietly and headed to the corners of the room. I walked over to the door, reached out into the hall to double check that it was locked, pulled it closed, and shut off the lights. I walked to the opposite end of the room and pulled down the shades, three of them. I then scanned my students huddled “out of sight” of the classroom door’s thin window, and sat on the floor next to my desk. I ducked my head down to avoid being easily seen.
That is it. That is the plan. In the minutes that passed in silence while administrators and police walked the halls jiggling door handles, I thought about the reality of the situation.
The first bullet would shatter the window in the door, allowing the shooter to reach inside and turn the handle. From there it would be a massacre. Sitting ducks. Fish in a barrel. The way the door swings open would mean the students in the corner opposite me would be first. Then the shooter would turn to the corner by the board where most of my students would be huddled tightly together, making even an inefficient shooter a killing machine. Then it would be me and the couple of kids with me behind my desk. It would take seconds. None of us would go home.
I think that outcome would be different if the first step in the lockdown were to unholster my gun, and position myself with a clear shot at the door - my students behind me. If I had been trained to a level of proficiency, I would wait there until the shooter came into view. Then I would fire as I had been trained to do. In that act, I would fulfill my promise as a school teacher to always do what was best for my students, to help them continue to grow. Most, if not all, of us would go home.
I think I was able to refuse ideas of arming teachers and increasing police presence in schools because although I taught students every day, none of them were my own kids.
Now, there are lots of mornings I send my two boys off to school with thoughts of Sandy Hook. The ghosts of those children haunt my boys’ bus stop. I wonder how many deaths would have been saved if teachers in that building were armed and trained to meet force with force. How quickly could they have neutralized the shooter?
I keep questioning if this is really what I feel. Do I really believe I would be a better teacher if I had a gun? Is that the answer?
I test that thought by asking if I would want my sons’ teachers to be carrying guns in school. My unequivocal answer is yes. Each time a school shooting takes the headlines my mind goes right to my sons. Their school’s plan for safety is the same as mine: more carefully monitoring the entrances, huddling kids into darkened corners. Soft targets. Easy pickings.
I have always aspired to be a courageous, but gentle person. I have not always succeeded in either count, but I have tried. But even peaceful men have a point when they become willing to take up arms. Atticus never did against Bob Ewell, and that man nearly killed his children. In the end it was only meeting force with force that saved them.
So, I volunteer. When our legislators realize that a war is being waged against innocent school children and someone needs to be able to shoot back, I will be first in line. I will study my weapon just as I have studied by books, and then I will enter my classroom prepared.
Atticus Finch is one of my favorite characters to teach. His ideals serve as a great example for my students of how to stand up for your convictions, how to hold onto your beliefs even when they are not popular, how to try every alternative before violence.
But we don’t live in his America. We live in a heavily weaponized America. We live in an America where social and mainstream media have offered unseen kids a path to being seen by everyone. We live in an America where students walk into schools and gun down their classmates.
Until that changes, my students deserve protection.
Every school day my son and my daughter-in-law leave in the early morning
ReplyDeleteto begin yet a new day of what they hope will be an opportunity for inspiring
and perhaps enlightening their students. Every school day they pack-up that
dedication, kiss and hug my grandsons, and head out the door.
Every school day my two soulful, kind, curious, funny, thoughtful , loving grandsons
wait for the bus a bit bleary-eyed from early rising, yet off to be with friends and
teachers in that citadel of learning and growth--their school.
Every school day, my two other wonderful grandchildren follow pretty much the
same routine. They live in idyllic Connecticut--not far from Sandy Hook.
There are more reasons than I can name for why I have always considered guns
the wrong answer
Idealistically, the concept of arming teachers can certainly be embraced with the
motive of courage and protection; yet, it can easily become a quagmire of risks--
the horrendous burden of "instant" decision making determined by heart pounding
circumstances, the possibility of a student somehow getting that gun from a teacher,
the responsibility of now having a gun in your home --on and on it goes. Doesn't arming
teachers send a clear message to students that the NRA is , after all, right--everyone should
have a gun at the ready?
Then there is the consideration of making fear a part of a household with a father
who wears a gun to school. How do little minds sort out these complexities? How do
they live with the underlying daily anxiety that today their father may shoot someone,
or worse, get shot. How do they sleep at night? Isn't it possible that arming a teacher, even a willing one, brings the atrocities of what we currently face right into the only sacred, safe place kids have--their home?
For me there is a sadness in what I believe. In order to safeguard our children, it takes
money and management. It takes lawmakers with a conscience to legislate and
install those safeguards. Our government body currently turns a blind eye to the slaughter of
innocent children Inconceivable. Yet, a fact.
So perhaps, in light of all of this, one approach might be to live our lives without
the crippling emphasis on fear. To make our homes a safe haven filled with love
and security, to begin each new day "armed" with our own dedication to life and those
we love. We have no way of predicting what might lay around the corner in our lives,
but I would hope that those I love don't approach that corner with a gun.
Love,
Mom
That is a beautifully written response. Your first two paragraphs are the perfect embodiment of why I have even been able to entertain the stance I just wrote about. I want those two idealistic teachers to come home to your grandsons. I want your grandsons to be there for you to greet as they step off of the bus filled with news of another day at school.
DeleteAs I wrote the piece, I was haunted by the connections between the stance I was taking and both the NRA and Trump. I don't believe the NRA is right in the idea that we should all arm ourselves. I think our leaders need to stop taking the NRA's money and start legislating a solution to this problem as other civilized countries have.
My problem is that they are not. Our leaders are not rectifying this problem. I don't want to live in a world where guns are this readily accessible, but I do. I don't want my sons to have to acknowledge this threat when they see their English teacher father holster his gun for a day of classes. I don't want that. But, I would trade that image in their minds for their safety. I would trade the anxiety I would cause some of my students for the ability to protect them if the time came.
I was moved by your final paragraph. That is the life I want to live. I hope we can get back to that place. Still, when I am huddled in a room with thirty innocent kids doing a drill, I just can't get past the fact that we would all be helpless in the face of an actual tragedy. I can't get past the belief that our odds would be better if I were armed. I can't get past my feeling that, given the current landscape, it is a trade I would make.
Over the past few years, I have had a difficult time taking a side in the debate on gun control versus gun rights. There are good arguments for both sides, and I can’t settle on what I think is the right answer. What I do know is that during times like this, when emotions are running high, I try to focus on what I think, rather than what I feel…
ReplyDeleteAccording to the Washington Post, there have been 128 fatalities from mass school shootings, including the death of the perpetrators since the Columbine shootings in 1999. A google search of school shooting deaths returns 1,170,000,000 hits.
According to poison.org, there have been 212 poising related deaths between 2012 and 2016…12 of these poisoning deaths were from batteries – ie children have died from battery poisoning at about 50% the rate as from mass school shootings, on average, per year. A google search on children poisoning deaths only returned 9,880,000 hits.
According to the CDC, there have been 675 flu related deaths in children under age 18 between 2011 and 2016. A google search on children flu deaths only returned 11,200,000 hits
According to teensafe.com, there are 11 texting and driving related teenage deaths EVERY DAY. A google search on children driving deaths returns 49,600,000 hits and Children text and driving deaths return only 16,700,000 hits.
We are living in a world of 24/7 media access. Today’s media has mastered the art of evoking emotion, particularly fear. Fear is a strong weapon for those suggesting that, through liberal gun laws, arming one’s self is the best form of protection. I wonder if that people’s way of trying to grab control around events that make them feel like they lack control.
While I can’t make up my mind on the 2nd amendment debate, I am firmly of the belief that more guns in schools is not the answer. I look forward to exploring your views on arming teachers in more detail, especially over a nice dinner and drinks.
Ed
Thanks for taking the time to post this, Ed. My hope in writing was to spur on some important conversation, and you make some excellent points.
DeleteI could not agree more that the news has mastered the art of evoking fear. I am certain I have fallen victim to that at numerous times as I have tried to process two decades of school shootings with my students. I am certainly guilty of feeling my way through part of this response rather than thinking. My thoughts can't always seem to outstrip my feelings when huddled in a darkened classroom with my students during a drill.
I think you are right when you talk about trying to grab control of events over which I have no control.
I don't read about childhood poisonings because I have the ability to keep poisons out of my children's hands in my house. I can teach them how to avoid eating batteries. We have child safety caps. Poisonings among children happen when kids accidentally ingest a poison, not when someone else with ill intent forces it down their throats.
I don't read about flu deaths, because we have access to flu shots, and good healthcare coverage, and nearby hospitals with plenty of Zofran and re-hydrating IVs.
I do worry a bit about texting, but know that I can teach my kids not to text while driving. I don't do that when I drive, and when by sons drive I can take their phones away.
There are all sorts of statistical ways death is more likely, but I usually feel like I have something that allows me to control the odds a bit. I have some actionable way to tip the scales in our favor.
In all of those scenarios, there are steps I can take that offer me at least some level of control. Not complete control, certainly, but some. I think that is why I would be willing to carry a gun as a teacher. I would have some level of control rather than absolutely none.
Anyway, thanks for weighing in. Does this mean we are invited to dinner?